Successfully requested Ex Parte Reexamination and prosecuted two submissions under 37 CFR 1.501 against the validity of the asserted patent. for camera mouth mounts, for, e.g., surfers to hold a camera in their mouth while surfing. Doe Defendant (Southern District of California & USPTO, 2016), Worked for a defendant accused of infringing U.S. The case successfully settled after Markman order. X for a wireless electrical apparatus controller and a related family of patents. Doe Defendant (Northern District of Alabama, 2015), Second Chair in case for the Plaintiff enforcing U.S. 6,459,023 entitled “Mounting board for guitar effects.” The proceeding favorably ended via narrowing amendments of the relevant patent rights. ProStage (USPTO, 2015), Participated in successful request for Ex Parte Reexamination Cont. 6,155,958 entitled “Stationary exercise bicycle having a rigid frame.” The case was resolved successfully. Multisports (Central District of California, 2014), Worked in defense against alleged infringement of U.S. D681,624 & D682,815 for a “protective cover” and “case” for cell phones.The case successfully settled prior to Markman briefing. (Southern District of California, 2013), Worked for plaintiff to enforce U.S. 8479,946 entitled “Portable drip containment device apparatus and method.”The case resolved favorably after claim construction briefing and a successful request for Ex Parte Reexamination Cont. Cowboy Containments (Northern District of Texas (Dallas Division), 2013), Worked in defense versus alleged infringement of an oilfield related patent, namely U.S. 8,342,325 entitled “housing for receiving and encasing an object” (e.g., cellphone). Seidio (Southern District of California, 2013), Litigation support for a defendant accused of infringing U.S. D523,461 entitled “Eyeglass component.” The case resolved successfully. Global One Sales and Distribution Sportsman Eyewear (Southern District of California, 2012), Litigation support for a defendant accused of infringing U.S. Just some of the cases Bryce has worked on for plaintiffs and defense include: Bryce is extremely familiar with the critical interplay between the administrative forums and those in federal courts. Johnson’s input has been instrumental to the successful resolution or victories in these matters. Outside of patent prosecution, Bryce has been involved with dozens of patent infringement and other intellectual property matters in federal court, and in administrative venues at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (“PTAB”). Some of the patents Bryce has achieved are listed here. He has been actively involved in the prosecution of over 400 hundred patents and named as an attorney of record on over 190 patents spanning a range of technologies from oil field, firearms, software, to sports equipment, manufacturing, household devices and cannabis. Bryce has extensive experience as a registered patent attorney both in acquiring patents and in litigating patent disputes in federal court and at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (“PTAB”).īryce’s experience with patent prosecution is wide-ranging. in the Austin, Texas office, and his practice focuses on patents and intellectual property. Bryce Johnson is a partner of Buche & Associates, P.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |